Discussion 1 and 2 Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Discussion 1 and 2 - Coursework ExampleLibel basically encompasses the negative exposure of ones character to the public by dint of the print media or general publishing. In most cases libel may lead to a person being perceived negatively, hated and exposed to calamitous facets of daily life. For instance A libel may include a journalist providing the public with published information that exposes a politician of corruption acts or even murder and drug businesses this includes published internet sources (eMedia Law Insider n.d.).. In regards to bobtails case, it is possible for him to demand the exposure of the identity of the person who affix the calumnious statements about him on the internet. There are various stipulations in the impartiality that gives Bob the capacity to demand for such information To begin with, Bob has the right to demand for such information provided he gives the court a prima facie that shows that he was actually exposed negatively on the internet. He should alike provide evidence on the extent of damage he underwent after the comments in accordance to the law (eMedia Law Insider n.d.)Campus Trash Mouth is a website that allows nameless writers to post comments in this perspective, Bob may non win the case against Campus Trash Mouth since his allegations that he was negatively exposed on their website will await on whether or not the comments were posted by the Campus Trash Mouth website themselves or it was done by an anonymous writer. However, according to the case study, it is evident that the defamatory statements were posted by an anonymous writer which renders them completely unreliable for the allegations. (The comments were posted by an anonymous person hence Campus Trash Mouth may not be held responsible)Additionally, Bob may also lose the case against Campus Trash Mouth on the condition that there are various stipulations in the law that may not necessitate the owners of the website to provide the identity of the an onymous writers.